You’re invited! Celebrate Earth Day with Flow!

Join us on April 22 from 5:30 to 7:30 pm at the Barrel Room at Left Foot Charley for a relaxed Earth Day gathering with Flow Water Advocates, featuring food, wine, and great conversation. Executive Director Liz Kirkwood will share brief reflections and a look ahead at our priorities for protecting the Great Lakes.

Space is limited, so we encourage you to RSVP and celebrate Earth Day in community with us.

This event is free. Wine from Left Foot Charley and light charcuterie will be provided.

Save the date:

📍 When: April 22, 5:30 to 7:30pm

📍 Where: Left Foot Charley, The Barrel Room, 1400 Yellow Dr, Traverse City, MI 49684

📍 What: A FREE community event to share love for the Great Lakes and get to know Flow Water Advocates. 

Flow opposes Great Lakes funding cuts proposed in federal budget.

Traverse City, Mich. — Flow Water Advocates opposes the proposed federal environmental budget, which includes major cuts to programs that protect clean water, public health, and the Great Lakes.

“These budget cuts would jeopardize the water and systems that Michiganders and people throughout the Great Lakes region rely on,” said Liz Kirkwood, Executive Director of Flow Water Advocates. “From the Great Lakes to groundwater, the health and safety of our water depends on strong federal support for monitoring, infrastructure, and protection.”

The proposal includes deep cuts to the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA), and what may be the most consequential reduction for Michigan: the Clean Water and Drinking Water State Revolving Funds (SRFs). The SRFs are a primary source of funding for critical infrastructure projects, failing septic systems, wastewater treatment, and ensuring safe drinking water.

The proposed cuts would total roughly $2.5 billion — an 89 percent reduction to these programs nationwide. In fiscal year 2024, Michigan received $35.1 million in funding in traditional appropriations for its clean water revolving loan fund and $11.3 million for its drinking water revolving loan fund. (Michigan received additional one-time appropriations for the revolving loan funds from the federal bipartisan infrastructure law.)

Flow Water Advocates urges federal leaders to protect investments in clean water programs that safeguard public health, support local economies, and uphold the shared responsibility to protect our waters for future generations.

###

Flow Water Advocates is an independent 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization based in Traverse City, Michigan. Our mission is to ensure the waters of the Great Lakes Basin are healthy, public, and protected for all. With a staff of legal and policy experts, strategic communicators, and community builders, Flow is a trusted resource for Great Lakes advocates. We help communities, businesses, agencies, and governments make informed policy decisions and protect public trust rights to water. Learn more at FlowWaterAdvocates.org.

The Clean Water Act and Section 401: EPA proposes to dismantle critical water protections

The Clean Water Act (CWA) was enacted in 1972, with the objective of “restor[ing] and maintain[ing] the chemical, physical, and biological integrity of the Nation’s waters.”1 The CWA’s core purpose is to protect fish, other wildlife, and water recreation.2 It also helps protect human drinking water by regulating pollution in source waters like lakes, rivers, and streams. Over the past 50-plus years, the CWA has fundamentally transformed water quality in the U.S. by reducing industrial and sewage pollution, expanding wastewater treatment, and protecting wetlands.

However, a critical provision of the CWA is now under attack. In early 2026, the EPA proposed amendments to the CWA’s Section 401 Rule that would dramatically reduce Michigan’s (and other states’ and tribes’) role in protecting its waters — including the Great Lakes. The proposed revisions would significantly limit state and tribal authority to protect water — authority that Congress plainly intended the states to retain.3

Currently, Section 401 provides states and Tribes with tools to collaborate with federal agencies to protect the waters within their borders.4 Under Section 401, a federal agency cannot issue a permit or license to discharge into waters unless Section 401 certification is issued by the relevant state and/or Tribe.5

The proposed revisions attempt to do the following:

  • Narrow the scope of the certifying authorities (state or Tribe) analysis and review from “activity” to point source discharge
  • Prevent states and Tribes from adding additional elements to certification
  • Removes automatic extensions for certain situations
  • Defines the contents of certification decisions for all authorities (both states and Tribes),
  • Requires states and Tribes to get permission from the Federal agency and the applicant to modify grants of certification,
  • Removes text that allows Tribes to administer the program instead of the EPA (called Treatment as a State or TAS), among other changes.6

Highlighted in a comment letter (PDF) by a multistate coalition of 18 attorneys general opposing the amendments, the proposed rule “upends the very role given to states to protect their own waters.”7 Flow Water Advocates, alongside the Clean Water for All Coalition, signed on to comments in opposition to the EPA’s proposed rule, which states in part:

“The proposed rule will lead to more water pollution, more destruction of critical aquatic resources, more risk of flooding and other disasters, more threats to drinking water and public health, the loss of habitat, deprivation of recreational and other opportunities, and other negative consequences for our waters and the people – which is all of us – that rely on them.”

The EPA intends to finalize the rule by the spring of 2026.


References

1. Clean Water Act, 33 USCS § 1251.
2. Id.
3. 33 USC § 1251(b).
4. Overview of CWA Section 401 Certification, EPA, https://www.epa.gov/cwa-401/overview-cwa-section-401-certification.
5. 33 USC § 1341.
6. Updating the Section 401 Water Quality Certification Regulation, EPA-Office of Water, https://www.epa.gov/system/files/documents/2026-01/cwa401_proposed-rule_public-meeting-overview_jan2026_0.pdf.
7. Danny Wimmer, AG Nessel Condemns Trump Administration’s Proposal to Dismantle Water Quality Regulations and Curtail State Authority, Mich. Dept. of Attorney General (Feb. 24, 2026) https://www.michigan.gov/ag/news/press-releases/2026/02/24/ag-nessel-condemns-trump-administration.

World Water Day matters for Michigan.

Every year on March 22, people around the world recognize World Water Day—a time to reflect on just how essential water is to our lives, our communities, and our future. Here in Michigan, water isn’t just important—it’s part of who we are. Surrounded by the Great Lakes and home to thousands of inland lakes, rivers, and streams, we’re lucky to live in one of the most water-rich places on Earth. But that doesn’t mean our water is protected. That’s why this year, we’re proud to support a World Water Day resolution in the Michigan House of Representatives and shine a spotlight on the value of water and the responsibility we all share.

Water touches nearly every part of our daily lives. It’s in the glass we drink from, the food we grow, the places we swim and fish, and the ecosystems that sustain wildlife. But access to clean, safe water isn’t equal for everyone. Many communities—especially rural households relying on private wells—face real challenges with contamination from things like nitrates, failing septic systems, and large-scale industrial pollution. Too often, these problems go unseen or unaddressed.

The global theme for World Water Day this year is “Water and Gender.” At first glance, that might not seem like a Michigan issue—but it absolutely is. Across the world and here at home, women often play a central role in managing water in their households and communities. They are often the ones ensuring families have safe water to drink, cook with, and use every day. Yet women are often underrepresented in decision-making about water policy and management.

This understanding is deeply rooted in Indigenous knowledge as well. In Anishinaabe culture, women are recognized as the caretakers and protectors of water. This responsibility is not just symbolic—it reflects a deep, lived relationship with water as a source of life that must be respected, honored, and safeguarded. Recognizing this connection helps us think more broadly about who is impacted by water challenges, and whose voices need to be included in solutions. We must remember that protecting water is not just a policy issue, but a cultural and moral responsibility.

A resolution might seem like a symbolic step, but it plays an important role. It’s a public acknowledgment from state leaders that: water is fundamental to life and public health, protecting it should be a shared priority, and we must do more to ensure everyone has access to clean, safe water. It also helps build momentum. Raising awareness can lead to stronger policies, better funding, and more coordinated action to address the challenges we’re facing.

At Flow Water Advocates, we believe water is held in trust for all of us—now and for future generations. That means we have both a right to it and a responsibility to protect it. World Water Day is a moment to pause and reflect, and it’s also a call to action. Because protecting Michigan’s water isn’t just about one day. It’s about the choices we make every day.

Protecting Michigan’s “Sixth Great Lake”: Live webinar with the University of Michigan School for Environment and Sustainability

In February 2025,  Flow and students from the University of Michigan’s School for Environment and Sustainability (SEAS) graduate program teamed up for a 16-month initiative to examine Michigan’s groundwater management and propose a statewide strategy to ensure long-term, sustainable groundwater governance.

Protecting and managing groundwater is particularly complex given the lack of comprehensive data, fragmented state authority governing water quality versus quantity, unclear and differing policies managing water quantity versus water quality, and the lack of public education and knowledge. Over the last five years, an increasing number of state agencies, scientific experts, philanthropy, and nonprofits have raised awareness of this understudied, underfunded, and underappreciated resource that is integral to the health and well-being of all Great Lakes waters. 

Save the date:

📍 When: April 8, 12pm

📍 Where: Online, zoom. Register here! 

📍 What: A FREE live webinar discussing key recommendations to protect Michigan’s water.

Webinar recording coming next week!

Building on these previous groundwater reports and assessments, Flow, in partnership with the University of Michigan’s SEAS, will develop a strategy for groundwater reform that addresses quantity, quality, and justice challenges; and offers regulatory, statutory, and institutional structural recommendations.

Meet the graduate students.

We asked the SEAS graduate students to share their perspectives about this groundwater project. Read their responses to all things groundwater! 

Paige Lund

Lillian Wege

Kelsey Campana

Emma Welsh

Line 5 tunnel appeal: Join us in Lansing on March 11!

Flow Water Advocates and our allies are challenging the MPSC’s Line 5 tunnel permit in the Michigan Supreme Court, and you’re invited to a gathering and press conference in Lansing on March 11. 

Join in community at Lansing’s Central United Methodist Church at 9:00am to listen to oral arguments via livestream, make posters, and mingle with other Line 5 advocates. Space in the courtroom is very limited, so we’ve arranged this separate venue where everyone can listen and participate.

Following oral arguments, we’ll head to the Michigan Supreme Court steps for a press conference and show of solidarity. 

Coming from Traverse City? Oil & Water Don’t Mix has arranged for a bus to take folks down to Lansing at 5:45am; returning at 3:30pm.

Whether you plan to ride the bus or not, please register here for this event:

Flow to host webinar about new septic system legislation

Traverse City, Mich. – Michigan’s water and public health are threatened by an estimated 330,000 failing septic systems, but new legislation (SB 771) recently introduced by Sen. Sam Singh (D-28) proposes common-sense statewide septic standards to help keep human and household wastes out of our lakes, rivers, and drinking water wells. Michigan is the only state in the U.S. without a statewide septic code, and only 12 of Michigan’s 83 counties have septic ordinances.

On March 6, 2026 at 12:30pm, Flow Water Advocates will host a live webinar via Zoom with Sen. Singh to discuss Michigan’s outdated, fragmented approach to septic system oversight and how key provisions in the new bill will protect water quality, property values, and human health.

Sen. Singh will be joined by a panel of experts, including Megan Tinsley, Water Policy Director, Michigan Environmental Council; Dan Thorell, Health Officer, Benzie-Leelanau District Health Department; and Anthony Kendall, Assistant Professor of Environmental Science, Michigan State University. The event will be moderated by Skip Pruss, Flow Senior Advisor and former Deputy Director of the Michigan Department of Environmental Quality (now EGLE).

The webinar is free to attend, and will include audience Q&A. Registration is available online at www.FlowWaterAdvocates.org/septic and via Zoom.

Meet our panelists:

Sen. Sam Singh, Michigan State Senator (D-28)
Sam Singh is a Democratic Michigan State Senator representing the 28th District and serves as Senate Majority Floor Leader in his first Senate term. He previously served three terms in the Michigan House of Representatives, where he was selected by his colleagues as Democratic Leader and championed education, environmental protection, and economic development.

Anthony Kendall, Assistant Professor in Earth and Environmental Sciences and AgBioResearch, Michigan State University
A lifelong Michigan resident, he studies how climate and land use impact water resources and the human and ecological systems that depend on them. His research reveals the hidden processes shaping water use and informs resource management decisions. Anthony is also a dedicated educator, training the next generation of scientists, practitioners, and decision-makers at the undergraduate and graduate levels.

Dan Thorell, Health Officer, Benzie-Leelanau District Health Department
Dan Thorell is a public health leader with more than 29 years of experience in environmental health. He serves as health officer for the Benzie-Leelanau District Health Department. He was previously the Health Officer, Deputy Health Officer and
Environmental Health Director at the Health Department of Northwest Michigan. Thorell Executive currently serves on the Board of Directors for the Michigan
Association of Local Public Health.

Megan Tinsley, Water Policy Director, Michigan Environmental Council
The Delta Charter Township resident comes to the Environmental Council with 12 years of combined experience at two Audubon Societies. She began as an Everglades science advocate and policy associate at Audubon Florida, where she coordinated with scientists and other allies to advance restoration projects like increasing freshwater flows to Florida Bay. She then moved to New Jersey Audubon as a conservation associate and a policy director.

SRAP and Flow file comments against proposed KB Dairy, citing lack of groundwater permit, etc.

In a joint effort to protect water quality and community health in mid-Michigan, the Socially Responsible Agriculture Project (SRAP) and Flow Water Advocates (Flow) have submitted detailed comments urging the Michigan Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE) to deny a proposed permit for KB Dairy, a large concentrated animal feeding operation (CAFO) planned near Ithaca. Their joint comments focus on serious regulatory gaps and environmental risks that could impact the Pine River Watershed and surrounding communities.

A strategic partnership for water protection.

SRAP, “Socially Responsible Agriculture Project” is a national nonprofit supporting communities impacted by industrial livestock operations, partnered with Flow, a Michigan-based water protection organization, to bring both legal expertise and local watershed knowledge to the issue. Together, they argue that KB Dairy cannot be evaluated in isolation. Instead, it must be considered alongside the adjacent De Saegher Dairy and related entities because of shared infrastructure, waste systems, and ownership ties.

Big issues raised in the comments.
  1. Failure to require a groundwater permit
    The groups argue that the combined number of animals at the KB and De Saegher facilities far exceeds Michigan’s regulatory threshold requiring a state groundwater discharge permit. With nearly 12,000 cattle projected at the site, and documented shallow groundwater conditions, they contend that relying solely on a CAFO general permit ignores clear risks to drinking water and aquifers that feed into the Pine River system.

  2. Commingled waste and common infrastructure
    The comments detail how waste from multiple dairies is piped into a shared anaerobic digester and then redistributed back into storage lagoons and land application fields. This commingling of manure and digestate—along with shared roads, storage pits, and irrigation systems—indicates the facilities function as one operation. Treating them as separate entities, SRAP and Flow argue, allows operators to skirt stricter environmental oversight.

  3. Common ownership and regulatory evasion
    The organizations present evidence suggesting overlapping corporate control, shared financing, land transfers, and joint mortgages among the dairy entities. Under state and federal rules, adjacent operations under common ownership using shared waste systems must be permitted together. Failing to recognize this relationship, they argue, undermines enforcement and weakens public protections.

Impacts on public health & the environment.

The Pine River Watershed includes vulnerable soils, shallow groundwater, and hydrological connections that make it particularly susceptible to nutrient pollution. Excess nitrogen, phosphorus, pathogens, and emerging contaminants from manure and digestate can contaminate private wells, harm aquatic ecosystems, and contribute to algal blooms downstream.

By calling for a comprehensive groundwater review and a unified permitting approach, SRAP and Flow are urging regulators to prioritize science-based oversight. Their message is clear: without stronger scrutiny, the expansion of industrial dairy operations could jeopardize clean drinking water, degrade the Pine River, and place long-term public health and environmental integrity at risk.

Community voices rise at KB Dairy hearing to protect the Pine River Watershed

On February 3, 2026, Flow, in partnership with Michiganders for a Just Farming System, hosted a virtual watch party for the KB Dairy public hearing. KB Dairy is a proposed CAFO facility in Gratiot County. The permittee has submitted materials to obtain coverage through a National Pollutant Discharge Elimination System (NPDES) permit. If approved, KB Dairy would begin dairy operations southwest of Ithaca, Michigan, immediately adjacent to their “parent” facility, De Saegher Dairy. Construction of the facility is already underway, however no animals are currently present on the site. 

Local residents, farmers, business owners, and advocates gathered and voiced their concerns about adding more than 3,400 more dairy cattle and their wastes to an already overburdened watershed. The proposed facility would be located within the Pine River Watershed, which has a storied history of industrial, and now agricultural pollution. Residents expressed their frustration with the situation, and the need for a more responsible agricultural future for their community. Speakers reminded EGLE that their priorities should be the health and quality of life of the people, not the benefit of one industry or permittee. 

Beyond allowing opportunities to make public comment, this event brought together folks from around the area to build relationships and share their experiences. Hosting events and creating space for local residents to connect and become empowered can amplify advocacy efforts throughout the state. Whether it’s fighting factory farms, oil and gas companies, or industrial polluters, residents typically feel that they are fighting an uphill battle with not enough resources. Flow strives to create space for people to come together and realize the strength they hold as a community. 

Flow's Chelsea Faber spoke with The New Lede's Brian Bienkowski about the Gratiot County CAFO! Watch the video below!