Tag: agriculture

Science alone won’t save the lake: Agricultural runoff in the Western Lake Erie Basin.

Facing facts and moving forward: Notes from the 2025 State of the Western Lake Erie Basin Conference.

On June 26, the State of the Western Lake Erie Basin (WLEB) conference, hosted by Michigan’s Department of Environment, Great Lakes, and Energy (EGLE), brought together researchers, agency staff, and community advocates working in one of Michigan’s most heavily farmed—and heavily polluted—regions.

The focus was on advancements and priorities in the WLEB, especially efforts to tackle harmful algal blooms (HABs). Highlighted tracks included:

  • Implementation Science in Agricultural Systems: Potentials for and Assessments of Innovative Behavior Change Interventions
  • Healthy Soils, Healthy Waters: Understanding Links Between Soil Health and Water Quality on Farms in the Western Lake Erie Basin
  • and Understanding Legacy Phosphorus in the Western Lake Erie Basin.

A common theme ran through all sessions: the problem is well understood—now is the time to implement real solutions to reduce pollution.

Agricultural runoff is the main issue.

EGLE made it clear that the biggest threat to the WLEB is non-point source pollution, particularly runoff from agricultural sources. That aligns with what they’ve stated in their MI Environment article about harmful algal blooms (HABs). The article explains, “In May, the State of Michigan updated its Domestic Action Plan (DAP) for combating harmful algal blooms (HABs). The plan contains measures to reduce phosphorus runoff by a sustained 40% from a 2008 baseline measurement by targeting nutrient-rich releases from wastewater treatment plants and phosphorus runoff from farm fields and fertilized lawns.”

Presenters reiterated throughout the day that this problem isn’t new and it’s not only about current practices. Decades of fertilizer use have left legacy phosphorus in soils and sediments. Addressing these long-term consequences is critical to building effective, lasting solutions and achieving sustainable land management.

People are trying new things.

Despite the challenges, there were some encouraging updates. One session focused on using behavioral science—not just facts and figures—to help understand how farmers make decisions. Findings show that simply providing more information doesn’t always lead to action; real change requires meeting people where they are.

Another panel showed how improving soil health can also help reduce runoff. However, even with these promising tools, a major theme emerged again: none of it will scale up without stronger policies to support it.

Policy support is the missing piece.

A major challenge is the damage resulting from environmental rollbacks. During the Trump administration in 2020, agencies like the EPA and USDA weakened review processes, referring to it as “permitting reform.” In truth, these changes limited public input and undermined environmental protections. Fact sheets from that time detailed reduced deadlines and page counts—presented as cutting red tape—but in practice, these reforms made it easier for large-scale projects, including agricultural operations, to bypass environmental scrutiny. That’s a serious concern in regions like Western Lake Erie.

Science alone won’t save the lake.

The conference underscored a key takeaway: science alone isn’t enough to solve nutrient pollution. Policies rooted in strong science—and the enforcement to support them—are essential. Otherwise, even the best ideas remain stuck in pilot programs.
The case of the Western Lake Erie Basin shows what happens when known problems go unaddressed—but also what’s possible when land use and water protection are treated as urgent, interdependent priorities.

At Flow Water Advocates, the work continues to advocate for policies that protect Michigan’s water and communities. Clean water depends on effective protections—and real accountability—when it comes to farming, development, and pollution.

FLOW supports the Honor Farmer Contracts Act: Defending farmers from DOGE cuts to USDA

FLOW has joined a coalition of over 350 farm, food, and rural organizations calling for the passage of the Honor Farmer Contacts Act, which would order the USDA to unfreeze contracts that were targeted by the so-called Department of Government Efficiency (DOGE), headed by Elon Musk. The contracts were related to local and organic food programming, and many farmers and small businesses are now waiting for the USDA to pay for completed work.

Examples of critical projects that have been stymied by the haphazard delays and freezes include:

  • Rural infrastructure investments that will help farmers get products from the field to market;
  • Payments to farmers who planted cover crops to reduce erosion and improve their soil health;
  • Creation of market opportunities for farmers to sell more of what they grow through regional food systems that build resiliency in our food supply;
  • Assistance for young and beginning farmers and ranchers to access land, supporting the development of the next generation of farmers; and,
  • Investments in energy efficiency that will quickly lower energy bills for farmers facing rising input costs.

Farming practices and food systems also have big impacts on watersheds and climate resiliency. Programs that help farmers and organizations improve soil health, foster organic and regenerative farming, and strengthen local food networks pay big dividends – not just to farmers and human nutrition and health, but in clean, safe water for drinking, fishing, and recreation.

The uncertainty around when payments will be made has forced farmers – who often operate on tight margins – to cut staff and change planting strategies, just as the most productive season of the year approaches. The legislation would require the USDA to pay farmers for all past due amounts as quickly as possible.

The legislation was introduced in the U.S. Senate by Senator Cory Booker (D-NJ), whose statement reads “USDA’s refusal to pay what is owed to farmers and the organizations that support them is theft, plain and simple. It’s a critical time of year for farmers and ranchers. They should be doing what they love – feeding our communities, not worrying about unpaid contracts. This legislation will fix that by forcing USDA and the Trump Administration to hold up their end of the deal.”